Re: Fedora S3 Backed AMIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:42:57AM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 8:36, Tim Flink wrote:
> > As I'm learning more about EC2 and AMIs, I'm wondering what the plans
> > are for Fedora S3 backed AMIs.
> >
> > If I'm understanding correctly, an S3 backed AMI has no persistent
> > storage - once the instance is rebooted, all changes are effectively
> > reverted. This would mean that applying updates to an S3 backed AMI
> > would be a questionable process and any updates requiring a reboot
> > would be impossible.
> Instance storage of this sort does not go away when instances are merely 
> rebooted.  It is only destroyed at instance termination time.

>From the limited testing I've done using Amazon's Web Console it seems
like typing 'reboot' or 'shutdown -h now' does seem to terminate the
instance.  Am I doing it wrong?

cloud mailing list

[Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux