Re: Possible kernel config issue with Pandaboard ES (Phoronix)?

[Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I don't see how Fedora 17 ARM on the pandaboard ES is broken
>
> Peter,
>
> Since you quote my e-mail, I feel the need to clarify... I wasn't
> speaking about F17/ARM, just making a broad generalization as to
> 'release' software being more like 'beta', as often there's several
> fixes released shortly thereafter, meaning that the 'beta' wasn't as
> wide as it should have been. It was a comment on the fast-paced nature
> of software development nowadays, rather than a criticism of F17/ARM.
>
> And second, when I used the word "broken" it was in reference to
> software branded "alpha".
>
> Please, re-read my message and you'll surely understand it now.

I read it in the context of the thread, if it wasn't meant in the
context of the thread it's off topic.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm