Re: Possible kernel config issue with Pandaboard ES (Phoronix)?

[Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't see how Fedora 17 ARM on the pandaboard ES is broken

Peter,

Since you quote my e-mail, I feel the need to clarify... I wasn't
speaking about F17/ARM, just making a broad generalization as to
'release' software being more like 'beta', as often there's several
fixes released shortly thereafter, meaning that the 'beta' wasn't as
wide as it should have been. It was a comment on the fast-paced nature
of software development nowadays, rather than a criticism of F17/ARM.

And second, when I used the word "broken" it was in reference to
software branded "alpha".

Please, re-read my message and you'll surely understand it now.
FC
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm