Re: Possible kernel config issue with Pandaboard ES (Phoronix)?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't see how Fedora 17 ARM on the pandaboard ES is broken Peter, Since you quote my e-mail, I feel the need to clarify... I wasn't speaking about F17/ARM, just making a broad generalization as to 'release' software being more like 'beta', as often there's several fixes released shortly thereafter, meaning that the 'beta' wasn't as wide as it should have been. It was a comment on the fast-paced nature of software development nowadays, rather than a criticism of F17/ARM. And second, when I used the word "broken" it was in reference to software branded "alpha". Please, re-read my message and you'll surely understand it now. FC _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm