Re: Build status of F-17

[Niels de Vos <devos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here's the status update on various packages and builds on ARM in F-17.
>
> The differences between ARM and mainline come down to 6 things:
> 1) Builds exist in updates-testing but are broken in stable - Nothing
> to be done except for the mainline ones to be marked stable
> 2) Build is built happily in F-17 and is one or two revisions out in
> the NVR - due to a blocking dep 95% of these are due to llvm.
> 3) Build is FTBFS - See below
> 4) Mainline is FTBFS - See below
> 5) Non ARM packages (x86 / PPC)
> 6) Parent packages are FTBFS or not yet supported on ARM (gnat / ada mostly)
>
> Nothing needs to be done for 1). and in most cases 2) will clear out
> once we have llvm sorted. For 3 & 4 your help is appreciate. Let me
> know if you need help committing the fixes:
>
> This is the list through to around the letter I to start with:
>
> Build issues
>
...
> xqilla - FTBFS - deps : diet qpid-cpp -> condor

Filed Bug 817274 with a patch for xqilla and would appreciate it if
the maintainers (on CC) could apply it and push a new build.

Any FTBFS Bugs against Fedora 17 should add the F17FTBFS as a Blocked
Bug so that it is clear that it affects all architectures, not only
ARM. In addition, I added ARMTracker as a blocker too.

Cheers,
Niels
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm