Re: GCC status update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

2011/11/19 Henrik Nordström <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> tor 2011-11-17 klockan 02:55 -0500 skrev Jon Masters:
>> * gcc - making sure the bitfields patches are in place for v5
> Actually it's not quite in place for v7 even. The gcc in v7 still
> generates bad code on volatile bitfield accesses.
> And v5 probably needs even more changes in that area if I understood
> alignment requirements for v5 correctly.
> See separate discussion on 9 Nov last week regardign GCC PR #50521.
> It would be great if we could get help from some gcc developers in
> analysing the needed changes. The suggested patch which seems to fix
> known code generation is not yet in gcc trunk and is why we have not
> included it in the armv7hl gcc package even if it's been discussed a
> number of times.

Let me know if Linaro can help.  I see that Joey Ye from ARM is
working in this area as well.

-- Michael
arm mailing list

[Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux