Re: Koji status update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


tor 2011-11-17 klockan 21:48 -0500 skrev Jon Masters:

> 1). gcc. Having seen some of the discussion here with Jakub, etc. it's
> clear that the Fedora maintainers aren't going to accept this latest
> volatile bitfields patch unless it's in the upstream 4.6 branch (it is
> in trunk right now). So there are two upstreams to work with - Fedora,
> and GCC. We can try to pursue this, but it is not a quick fix (we're
> looking at several weeks to turn it around).

Actually I would argue there is three.. a lot of the work on gcc is
duplicated effort with the similar gcc work done by linaro. Most of the
rest of the Linux ARM world seems to be using the linaro version of GCC.

Regards
Henrik

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux