| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Well.This is not repoforge.Please dont take more difficulty to the developers On 2/1/12, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 16:19:08 +0100, > Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Whilst it is possible to maintain such a git branch at >> fedorahosted.org it would suffer from a lack of integration with the >> upstream branch hosted on GitHub itself. > > Wouldn't make more sense for maintainers to either get their own github > accounts or just keep a local checkout of upstreams they are interested in > so that they can work easier with upstreams? > > The form of patches used in rpms doesn't really match what upstreams would > need, so i am not sure what a project repo in github would provide that > maintainers can't get on their own? > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board -- Best Regards, Christopher Meng------'Cicku' My personal blog is http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say something about it. More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Linux Audio Users]