[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Endorsement of https://github.com/fedoraproject



Well.This is not repoforge.Please dont take more difficulty to the developers

On 2/1/12, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 16:19:08 +0100,
>   Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Whilst it is possible to maintain such a git branch at
>> fedorahosted.org it would suffer from a lack of integration with the
>> upstream branch hosted on GitHub itself.
>
> Wouldn't make more sense for maintainers to either get their own github
> accounts or just keep a local checkout of upstreams they are interested in
> so that they can work easier with upstreams?
>
> The form of patches used in rpms doesn't really match what upstreams would
> need, so i am not sure what a project repo in github would provide that
> maintainers can't get on their own?
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


-- 


Best Regards,
Christopher Meng------'Cicku'

My personal blog is http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say something
about it.
More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Linux Audio Users]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net