| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 01/19/2012 01:51 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> On 01/19/2012 12:41 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> >>> From my POV the move in question doesn't necessarily achieve anything >>> in the vision or further Fedora's goals. >> >> We disagree on that. Point 1 and 2 in the vision requires open tools. > > duckduckgo isn't open. From their own help site: > "DuckDuckGo is mostly closed source Yep. We already know that from the discussions earlier. Is it a improvement over Google is the real question however. Note, I didn't say "open source tools" Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Linux Audio Users]
