Re: Re: coolkey and evolution

["Timothy J. Miller" <tmiller@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:43 AM, John H. wrote:

> I'm not sure what you are referring to.  The site is not accessible
> except by using SSL.  Can you tell me how you are determining it is
> not using ssl client auth?  You mean through certificates?  As far as
> I understand, evolution does support this.

SSL can be deployed with server authN only, or with server and client  
authN.  Client authN can even be made optional, though not all end  
user agents deal with that particularly well.

-- Tim

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Coolkey-devel mailing list
Coolkey-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/coolkey-devel