Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: lm_sensors on alpha

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am 2007-03-15 16:56, Jay Estabrook schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:39:41PM +0300, Sergey Tikhonov wrote:
Oliver Falk wrote:

dmidecode is only available for i386 and x86_64, therefor we should ifarch the req for dmidecode out in lm_sensors, shouldn't we?

What do you think about this:
Index: lm_sensors.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dist/devel/lm_sensors/lm_sensors.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -r1.43 lm_sensors.spec
19a20
%ifarch i386 x86_64
20a22
%endif
I wonder this hasn't been done already, as it will make problems with ia64, ppc and so on as well. :-/

'Zilla this one also!?
I would say yes. :) I just ran sensors and sensors-detect to see that they just say no sensors found. Which is fine. If I remember correctly the lm_sensors itself was required some gnome package.

Well, not GNOME, but...

[jestabro@jaye3 ~]$ rpm -e --test lm_sensors
error: Failed dependencies:
    libsensors.so.3 is needed by (installed) kdebase-3.5.4-0.5.fc5.alpha

Whatever kdebase does with lm_sensors :-( I'm sure there are reasons...

Sergey, I think you're remembering the circular dependencies of
"pilot-link" and GNOME... ;-}

I do as well remember such cases... *grr*

-of


[Home]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net