Re: lm_sensors on alpha | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Am 2007-03-15 16:56, Jay Estabrook schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:39:41PM +0300, Sergey Tikhonov wrote:Oliver Falk wrote:dmidecode is only available for i386 and x86_64, therefor we should ifarch the req for dmidecode out in lm_sensors, shouldn't we?I would say yes. :) I just ran sensors and sensors-detect to see that they just say no sensors found. Which is fine. If I remember correctly the lm_sensors itself was required some gnome package.What do you think about this: Index: lm_sensors.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/dist/devel/lm_sensors/lm_sensors.spec,v retrieving revision 1.43 diff -r1.43 lm_sensors.spec 19a20%ifarch i386 x86_6420a22I wonder this hasn't been done already, as it will make problems with ia64, ppc and so on as well. :-/%endif'Zilla this one also!?Well, not GNOME, but... [jestabro@jaye3 ~]$ rpm -e --test lm_sensors error: Failed dependencies: libsensors.so.3 is needed by (installed) kdebase-3.5.4-0.5.fc5.alpha
Whatever kdebase does with lm_sensors :-( I'm sure there are reasons...
Sergey, I think you're remembering the circular dependencies of "pilot-link" and GNOME... ;-}
I do as well remember such cases... *grr* -of
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]