Re: New redhat-rpm-config for ac3
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On 14/03/2007, at 8:13 PM, Oliver Falk wrote:
Maybe you can add some statement on how to fix it in core-cvs without conflicting with the primary archs; I saw you just removed it from macros...
Yeah, I just patched it out for the moment, pending a better solution.I'm not entirely sure that dropping it from macros is actually the right approach, since in theory it shouldn't make any difference if it's there or not. The actual problem I was seeing was that in some autoconf scripts, the test for a working -fPIC was failing - this was what was causing build failures in a lot of packages.
I'll try to follow through the configure tests and narrow it down a little further. If it's the case that the -fstack-protector flag should do _nothing_ on an unsupported architecture, and it's doing _something_, then it really strikes me as a GCC bug, not something to fix in the RPM macros, which ideally should be consistent across architectures.
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]