Re: AlphaServer 400 vs. Alpha Core 1.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: AlphaServer 400 vs. Alpha Core 1.0
From: Sergey Tikhonov <tsv@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:32:32 +0300
Cc:
In-reply-to: <4360F6FD.5060301@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <435F7746.4030902@xxxxxxxxxx> <435F9028.2060705@xxxxxxxx> <20051026104605.C28264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <435F9E2D.8000309@xxxxxxxx> <4360AA48.4040503@xxxxxxxxxx> <4360C1CB.1020007@xxxxxxxx> <4360D60B.2030707@xxxxxxxxxx> <4360DE7D.9090308@xxxxxxxx> <20051027112402.A29975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4360F6FD.5060301@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Linux on Alpha processors <axp-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Marek wrote:

Hi,
With the AC2 qboot1 is the same


Could you check with qboot2? It has fix for old ncr controller.

Thank you,

--
Sergey Tikhonov
Solvo Ltd.
tsv@xxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: New AC2 release candidate test boot cd image
Next by Date: Re: AlphaServer 400 vs. Alpha Core 1.0
Previous by thread: Re: AlphaServer 400 vs. Alpha Core 1.0
Next by thread: Re: AlphaServer 400 vs. Alpha Core 1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]