Re: New AC2 release candidate - 5305
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Just returned from a wedding over the weekend. Here is a little more of the status so far: >What kernels can that box run? AC-1.0? CentOS-4.2? RH-7.2? >> >> --Jay++ >> >> Has been running modified RH 7.2 for a long time. >> Most recently 2.4.23 kernel. Did compile 2.6 there >> were too many changes so I gave up on that. >> >> Thought it was time to switch so I installed Core-1 >> It is doing fairly well however there is a scsi error >> showing occasionally and there is no X.>OK, so you've been running AC-1.0 kernel >(2.6.11-1.1180axp_FC3).
>Do you have a log with the SCSI errors shown? errors from dmesg: Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@xxxxxxxxxxxx). sym2: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=132 DBC=50000000 SBCL=0 sym0: SCSI parity error detected: SCR1=3 DBC=50000000 SBCL=0 sym0:0:0:M_REJECT received (0:8). st3: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.scsi0:A:5: unknown scsi bus phase a0, lastphase = 0xb4. Attempting to continue
This error occurs after the console login appears so I think it is related to the knfsd start however I have not taken the time to follow up on this yet.>And have you tried X using a different VGA, ie not the >builtin Trio64?
>Unfortunately, that one (Trio64) is problematic on Alpha. Since I use this primarily as a file server, samba domain server, internal web server for testing, etc X is to too important so I really did not try much but I did attempt to install a couple of other video cards. None managed to survive the boot test. At least with the Diamond cardI have a console. Just thought it would be interesting to see if it would run but I have not invested a lot of time
trying. -- Gary Richardson garich@xxxxxxx
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]