Re: [lorax] Keep all filesystem tools?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On 4/20/12 6:08 PM, Will Woods wrote: > I think we should probably keep all binaries from filesystem tools > packages. It would add approximately 700KB to the final images: > > compressed size > btrfs-progs: 120K > e2fsprogs: 18K > jfsutils: 131K > ntfs-3g: 48K > ntfsprogs: 138K > xfsprogs: 209K > TOTAL: 661K > > This seems reasonable, especially when we offer the installer image as a > rescue image.. > > Does this seem reasonable? I like it. :) If you need to find a little room, there are a probably a few that could be dropped from xfsprogs & e2fsprogs that I could offer guidance on. -Eric > -w > >  x86_64 binaries, compressed with xz > > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]